Law for business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 3

Law for worry - Essay ExampleDickman, however, stated that on that point is a requirement of proximity between the claimant and the defendant (Caparo Industries fleck v. Dickman 1990 2 AC 605). Foreseeability alone is not enough to create a duty of care (Hill v. headman Constable of West Yorkshire 1989 AC 53, 60).Thus, under the Donaghue test, a duty of care would be established. Donoghue concerned a decomposed snail in the claimants ginger beer. Initially, there was held to not be a duty of care, as there was not a proximity between the claimant and the shopkeeper, as the claimant did not purchase the ginger beer. However, the Donoghue court immovable that the shopkeeper did owe a duty of care to the woman, as it was clean foreseeable that she would be harmed by having snail in her drink, and she would have been considered to be a neighbor (Donoghue v. Stevenson, p. 580).Thus, under Donoghue, there would be capable proximity between the claimant, Jeff, and Rodney to establish a duty of care. Just as in the Donoghue case, there was not a special relationship between the parties, yet the harm was reasonably foreseeable it was reasonably foreseeable that, if one drinks and drives, an accident may occur. Jeff would be considered to be a neighbor in the loose intelligence of the term, in that the loose sense of the term would describe a neighbor as anybody who would be reasonably foreseeably harmed by the defendants lay outions. Therefore, under Donoghue, the first element, duty, is established.Next, did Rodney breach that duty? In other words, did he act as a reasonable man would act? (Blyth v. Company Proprietors of the Birmingham Water Works (1856) 11 Ex Ch 781). This is the accusing test for whether or not a breach occurred. At first glance, it would seem that Rodney did not act reasonably he drank and drove. And, there was some indication that the vehicle might have been unsafe, as it was describe as rather old. Therefore,