How can leaders lead when they don't know what to expect Essay

How can takeers lead when they dont know what to expect - Essay ExampleSimilarly setting a firm goal for the government is one of the few essentials that must be adhered in practicing successful leaders. It is in this context that leaders, to be hard-hitting in implementing successful strategies, must obtain a succinct understanding of what to expect from their followers and benefactors of their leadership practices (Kerr & Jermier, 1978). Focusing on this business lineive statement, the aim of the essay is to evaluate the significance leaders ability to mystify accurate expectations when defining goals and implementing strategies likewise. In order to accomplish this particular aim, the essay emphasizes conducting a literature analyse to gain an in-depth knowledge about the factors that determine leadership success in the 21st century context, followed by a case example analysis in respect to the Affordable Care Act polity enforced by the US President Mr. Barack Obama. Based on the information obtained through these sections, a circumstantial discussion has been conducted in this essay to derive a brief conclusion directly implying on the argument statement i.e. How can leaders lead when they dont know what to expect? The Concept and theatrical role of Leadership in the 21st Century According to Kaiser & Hogan (2005), although leadership has remained a topic of interest for many a(prenominal) years, and many researchers prepare contributed in the study of leadership, it still lacks a firm definition that can flex its multidimensional features in an all-inclusive manner. According to Judge & et. al., (2002), it is because of the fact that leadership practices depend on situational contexts, where the qualities of the followers and the availability of resources play a vital role in determining overall leadership intensity level also involving value-based philosophical attributes as major influences, defining the concept in a scientific panache as similar to other societal concepts, becomes a major challenge. Nevertheless, almost all the explanations derived in the accredited phenomenon focus on one common feature of successful leadership that the effectiveness of these practices depend on the leaders ability to understand or decode the change needs and define their expectations whence (Judge & et. al., 2002). It is in this context that Fry (2003) argued leaders to be attending both the task oriented and friendly or emotional issues through the directive and supportive behaviors, which further raises complexities in understanding the ability of the resources accessible and decide upon their expectations thereon. According to the admit (1996), the contingency theory emphasizes that an effective leadership approach must have a link between the leaders behavior and the situational conditions that further determines their accuracy of expectations. Expanding the contingency theory, House (1996) further argued that the path-go al theory of leadership joins the participative and achievement oriented leaders behaviors with their directive and supportive behavioural needs to focus on the association amid performance-reward and explain the follower about the importance of such associations in order to perform